Telephone call from a parent — bruises on a three-year-old
A mother phones about bruises on her three-year-old after “a fall down the stairs” two days ago. She would rather not bring him in.
Reviewed and kept current
Station family: Child safeguarding by telephone · 8-minute station · 1 min 30 s reading · Last editorial review: 19 September 2026.
Read this as you would outside the room
You have 1 minute 30 seconds to read, then 8 minutes. Candidates: everything below this section is folded away — leave it closed until you have finished the station.
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Your role | Foundation Year 2 doctor in a general practice, working through the duty-doctor telephone list. Your supervising GP, who is also the practice safeguarding lead, is in the building. |
| Caller | Ms Kelly Marsh, 27 — mother of Alfie Marsh, aged 3 |
| Reception note | “Mum says Alfie fell down the stairs 2 days ago — bruises on arms and back. Wants advice only. Says she can’t get in today.” |
| Alfie’s records | Immunisations up to date. Emergency department attendance four months ago: “pulled elbow”. Was not brought to his 2-year health visitor review. Sibling: Maisie, 6 months. No child protection plan recorded. |
| Format | Telephone. The call is already connected when you enter; the caller cannot see you. |
Your task
For the actor and the examiner
1 · Actor script — role player only
Candidates: do not open until you have consulted.
Persona and manner
- Kelly Marsh, 27. Two children: Alfie, 3, and Maisie, 6 months. You live with your partner Dean — Maisie’s father, not Alfie’s.
- Tired, guarded, speaking quietly: Dean is asleep upstairs after a night shift. You love your children. You are frightened of Dean’s temper and of social services.
Opening line — say this verbatim
- “Hiya. It’s about my little boy — he fell down the stairs the other day and he’s come up in bruises. I just wanted to check that’s normal. I can’t really bring him in.”
Volunteer freely if given the space
- It happened on Saturday, two days ago. You were bathing the baby; Dean was watching Alfie. You heard a bang and crying. Dean said he had slipped on the stairs.
- Alfie was a bit quiet afterwards but ate his tea. He seems all right now.
Only if asked
- Telephone checks: Alfie’s date of birth is 4 May 2023; you are at home; it is safe to ring this mobile until four o’clock.
- You did not see the fall.
- The bruises: both upper arms — “sort of round marks, like fingertips, on both arms”; several across his back; one on his bottom. You cannot explain the ones on his back. No new bruises on his shins or forehead.
- The ear: mention it only if asked about his head, face or ears, or “anywhere else at all?” — otherwise keep it until you are invited to add anything.
- Alfie now: playing, eating, walking normally. No vomiting, not drowsy, no fever, no rash or tiny red-purple spots, no nosebleeds or bleeding gums, not pale, not more tired than usual. He does not usually bruise easily. Nobody in the family has a bleeding problem.
- Why you did not call sooner: “Dean said he was fine and not to make a fuss.”
- The pulled elbow four months ago: “Dean was swinging him round.”
- Dean: drinks most nights and “has a temper”. If asked gently, and told why the doctor is asking: he has grabbed Alfie by the arms before when he would not stop crying. He has pushed you — once while you were holding the baby. You have never told anyone.
- Maisie: “She’s fine, I think. She cries a lot and it winds him up.”
- You missed the health visitor’s appointments. There is no social worker.
- Right now Dean is asleep; he leaves for work at six. You have no car.
Impact on daily life — home and family (only if asked)
- Alfie has become clingy, will not go upstairs on his own and flinches when Dean raises his voice.
- You are not sleeping. You have stopped seeing your mum because Dean does not like her.
- You do not feel safe in your own home, but the tenancy is in Dean’s name and you have nowhere else to go.
Ideas, concerns and expectations
- Idea: the bruises are from the fall — “kids bruise, don’t they?”
- Concerns: “Are you going to report me? Will they take my kids?” — and what Dean will do if he finds out you rang.
- Expectation: to be told the bruises are normal, and not to have to come in.
Cues to deliver, timed
- Minute 2: “I didn’t actually see it happen.” — then, quickly — “But Dean said he slipped.”
- Minute 4: “He’s got a temper, that’s all.”
- If asked abruptly “Is Dean hitting him?”: “No! Why would you say that?” — and say you should go. Stay on the line only if the doctor is kind.
If the doctor summarises and asks whether you want to add anything
- If the ear has not come up: a pause — “There’s a mark on his ear as well. It’s gone purple. I didn’t say because it looks bad.”
- If it has: “He grabbed him by the arms last month too.”
How to respond to the doctor
- If the doctor explains calmly that bruises in those places do not fit a fall, that Alfie needs to be examined by a children’s doctor today — to check he is not hurt more than it looks and to rule out medical causes of bruising — that they have to involve children’s social care so that Alfie and Maisie are safe, that you are not being accused, and that they want to help you too: you cry, then agree — “As long as Dean doesn’t find out it was me.” Your mum could drive you if someone rang her.
- If asked whether you and the children are safe right now: “He’s asleep. We’re okay till he wakes up about four.”
- If the doctor says “it’s probably just from the fall, keep an eye on it”: relieved — “Thanks, doctor” — and end the call.
- If the doctor threatens (“I’m calling the police”, “social services will take them”): panic — “Forget I rang” — and hang up.
- If the doctor promises to keep it secret: “So you won’t tell anyone? Promise?”
Do not
- Volunteer the fingertip pattern, the ear, Dean’s temper or that he has pushed you, unless asked or invited to add anything.
- Describe Alfie as unwell — he is not.
2 · Examiner mark sheet — generic scheme plus the key facts for this case
Domain marks — with the key facts that earn a 4 at this station
| Domain (GMC wording) · key facts for this case | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | /4 |
2 · Clinical management skills
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | /4 |
3 · Interpersonal skills
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | /4 |
| Station total | /12 |
Examiner's overall judgement (standard-setting only — it does not decide your result): ☐ Unsatisfactory ☐ Borderline ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Good
Marks are 1 to 4 in each domain; the generic descriptor for each mark is on the mark scheme page, and the structure of the eight minutes is on the 8-minute station page. The full standard for this case is in section 3 and the GMC feedback statements, with examples from this case, are in section 4.
3 · Expanded station-specific marking standard — what earns 4, 3, 2 and 1 here
The top row is the full picture of what a competent F2 could do at this station, including the working diagnosis with its justified differentials, the safety-net and the follow-up; lower rows describe how performance falls away. It is a debriefing aid, not a checklist to recite: nobody says every line in eight minutes, and a 4 is a judgement that the essentials — the italic key facts on the mark sheet — were done well, in plain language and at the patient’s pace. Acumen training standard — the GMC does not publish station mark sheets.
| Mark | Domain 1 · Data gathering, technical and assessment skills | Domain 2 · Clinical management skills | Domain 3 · Interpersonal skills |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
|
|
|
| 3 | Injury and bruise pattern well characterised and the household explored; one of the medical-cause screen, the sibling, or the impact on mother and child missing. | Same-day assessment and social care referral arranged with senior involvement; one of the sibling, the medical differentials, support for the mother or the safe call-back missing. | Kind and clear; safeguarding explained honestly; one fear not addressed or understanding checked only briefly. |
| 2 | Takes the “fall” at face value at first; bruise sites obtained but not shapes; home situation touched on only superficially; ICE not elicited. | Concern recognised but response is slow or partial: a routine appointment “in the next few days”; referral mentioned but not today; no explanation of why the bruises do not fit. | Polite but procedural; slips into leading questions; explanation of social care involvement rushed or frightening. |
| 1 | Minimal history; no description of the bruises; no questions about who else is at home. Or unsafe: no safeguarding enquiry at all; or interrogates and accuses so that the caller hangs up and the child is lost to follow-up. | Advises observation at home; or plans to “discuss at the next practice meeting”; no safety-net. Or unsafe: reassures that the bruises are normal; or promises to keep the call secret; or tells her to confront her partner. | Accusatory or alarmist tone; the caller becomes defensive. Or unsafe: threatens (“they will take your children”), lies about confidentiality, or is dismissive. |
4 · GMC feedback statements — where underperformance was identified — with case-specific examples
A feedback statement marks where underperformance was identified in the consultation. With PLAB 2 results the GMC may attach any combination of the ten statements to a station — none, one or several. The right-hand column shows what each one looks like at this station. Record the statements that applied in the practice log.
| GMC feedback statement | Underperformance it signals (generic) | Case-specific examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Consultation | Disorganised or unstructured consultation | Interrogates from the first sentence; swings between the fall, the partner and social services; no opening account, no summary. |
| 2 · Issues | Key issues or priorities not recognised | Runs it as a minor-injury advice call — “bruises fade in a week or two” — and does not recognise a safeguarding presentation or the risk to the baby. |
| 3 · Time | Poor time management | Long developmental and birth history; the decision about today and the explanation to the mother never happen. |
| 4 · Findings | Abnormal findings or results, or their implications, not identified | Does not register fingertip marks on both arms, bruising to the back, buttock and ear, an unwitnessed fall, a two-day delay, a previous “pulled elbow” and missed reviews — or fails to see what they add up to. |
| 5 · Examination | Physical examination or use of instruments not competent | Cannot examine by telephone — but does not ask her to describe the bruises, and does not recognise that the child must be examined face-to-face today. |
| 6 · Diagnosis | Working diagnosis or differential diagnoses not correct | Accepts “he fell downstairs”; or jumps to “this is abuse” without considering ITP, leukaemia or a clotting problem; cannot explain why the pattern does not fit a fall. |
| 7 · Management | Management plan not reflecting current best practice | “Keep an eye on him and ring back if worried”; a routine appointment next week; no senior told; no social care referral; the 6-month-old forgotten; no 999 advice; no safe call-back. |
| 8 · Rapport | Rapport and sensitivity to the patient’s feelings and concerns not shown | Accusatory (“Is your partner hitting him?”), or threatening (“social services will take them”); no acknowledgement of her fear. |
| 9 · Listening | Verbal and non-verbal cues not used; poor active listening | Misses “I didn’t actually see it happen” and “he’s got a temper, that’s all”; does not pick up that she is speaking quietly because someone is in the house. |
| 10 · Language | Language or explanations not understandable; understanding not checked | “I’ll need to make a section 47 referral to the MASH for a CP medical” — jargon with no explanation of what will actually happen today; plan not checked back. |
5 · Examiner points of fact and guidelines
Points of fact the examiner should have to hand
- NICE CG89: suspect maltreatment when bruising is in the shape of a hand, grip, ligature, stick or implement, or when there are bruises in a child who is not independently mobile, multiple bruises or clusters, bruises of similar shape and size, or bruises on non-bony parts of the body or face — including the eyes, ears and buttocks — without a suitable explanation. “Suspect” means refer to children’s social care.
- Accidental bruises in mobile toddlers are typically over bony prominences at the front of the body — shins, knees, forehead. Bruising to the torso, ears, neck, cheeks, buttocks and upper arms is not (the “TEN-4-FACESp” rule in under-fours: Torso, Ears, Neck; Frenulum, Angle of jaw, Cheeks, Eyelids, Subconjunctivae; any patterned bruise; and any bruise at all in a baby under five months).
- Bruises cannot be aged from their colour (RCPCH child protection evidence review). Describe site, size, shape and number; do not write “bruises of different ages”.
- Medical differentials must be excluded, not assumed: ITP, leukaemia, inherited clotting disorders, IgA vasculitis, meningococcal disease, and congenital dermal melanocytosis (formerly called “Mongolian blue spots”). A child protection medical includes a full blood count, film and clotting studies.
- A non-mobile baby in the same household is at particular risk. “Those who don’t cruise rarely bruise.”
- GMC, Protecting children and young people: you must tell an appropriate agency promptly if you are concerned a child is at risk of, or suffering, abuse or neglect. Ask for consent to share information unless that would increase the risk or cause delay; you can share without consent when it is justified to protect a child. Tell parents what you are doing unless that would put the child at greater risk.
- In England the framework is Working Together to Safeguard Children (2026): telephone referral to the local authority children’s social care team the same day, confirmed in writing; 999 if a child is in immediate danger. An F2 never manages this alone — the supervising GP and safeguarding lead are told at once.
- The mother is also a victim. Children who see, hear or experience the effects of domestic abuse are victims in their own right (Domestic Abuse Act 2021). Ask whether it is safe to talk and agree a safe way to call back.
- Record the call verbatim, with times, and who said what. Do not ask the child leading questions.
Where candidates lose marks at this station
- “Kids bruise — keep an eye on it.”
- Promising to keep the call confidential.
- Forgetting the six-month-old baby.
- Writing “bruises of different ages”.
- Frightening her off the line before there is a plan.
Guidelines for this station
6 · MLA content map tags for this case
| MLA content map | This station |
|---|---|
| Domain 1 · Areas of clinical practice | Child health · Acute and emergency · Clinical haematology |
| Domain 3 · Clinical and professional capabilities | Safeguarding vulnerable patients · History, examination and differential diagnosis · Managing risk · Capacity, consent and confidentiality · Team working |
| Domain 5 · Patient presentations | Bruising · Child abuse and neglect · Worried parent · Domestic abuse |
| Domain 6 · Conditions | Non-accidental injury · Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) · Leukaemia |
| Station family | Acute care, ethics and safeguarding — Child safeguarding by telephone |
7 · My marks and reflection — practice log form
Record your three domain marks, your station total, the GMC feedback statements that applied (where underperformance was identified), and what you will keep and change. The form is already labelled with this case and its web address; a copy of your entry is emailed to you, so your practice log builds up in your inbox and can be downloaded.
Record my marks and reflection for P2-06
Revision link for this case: acumenprimarycare.com/plab-2-osce/case-06-telephone-bruising-three-year-old
Independence & scope. Independent, formative training material from MD Acumen Ltd. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or delivered on behalf of the General Medical Council. The GMC does not publish its station mark sheets: every mark scheme and descriptor on these pages is an Acumen training tool calibrated to the GMC's published marking domains, feedback statements and the MLA content map. Practice scores are not a prediction of examination performance. Clinical content reflects UK guidance at the date of editorial review — always check the current guideline. All patients are fictional.
© 2026 MD Acumen Ltd · Acumen Institute of Primary Care · An MD Acumen school · Registered in England and Wales · 16538952PLAB 2 OSCE course · Practice cases · IMG roadmap · Observership · Legal & Regulatory · enquiry@mdacumen.com
